Takaya, Natsuki: Fruits Basket, vols. 1-2

Natsuki Takaya’s Fruits Basket is one of the most well-loved shôjo manga series out there. I resisted reading it for years because the art sent me into sugar shock. But recently, a combination of deep discounts and greater familiarity with manga conventions led me to try it again. I read the first two volumes as collected in the first “Ultimate Edition,” a larger-size hardcover volume (cheaper, more durable, but could have used things like a re-paginated sound effects guide for the second volume).

Tohru is an orphan who ends up living with three members of the Sohma family, who are under a curse: they are possessed by vengeful spirits corresponding to the Chinese Zodiac, and when hugged by a member of the opposite sex, they turn into that animal. There’s much that’s, well, sweet and cute about this—Tohru is amazingly optimistic and self-sacrificing; the transformed Sohmas are intrinsically comic and look very cuddly; and many of the conflicts are played for laughs. Yet even in the first two volumes, the darker undercurrents are apparent: Tohru’s optimism hints at an underlying desparation; one instance of the curse leading to heartbreak is revealed; and extremely screwed-up family dynamics are suggested. Between my interest in the mystery of the curse, curiosity about Tohru’s mom, and sympathy for the characters, I’ll keep reading.

For examples of the art and how it works, see these two posts of Stephanie’s on visual flow.

3 Replies to “Takaya, Natsuki: Fruits Basket, vols. 1-2”

  1. Coincidentally, last night I finished reading a novel (Lindskold’s Thirteen Orphans) which was also about characters possessed (sorta kinda) by the Chinese Zodiac.

  2. I liked it, but I liked Through Wolf’s Eyes more than you did. It’s the start of a series and I’m not sure where she’s headed with it; this book is urban fantasy, but it ends with discussions of traveling to a secondary world. You can read the prologue and first chapter off her website.
    Lindskold is good at likable characters and interesting premises, but not so good at subtlety or sophistication (lots of internal monologuing); this book doesn’t have any villain POVs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *