{"id":193,"date":"2003-01-12T21:59:10","date_gmt":"2003-01-13T02:59:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog-test\/?p=193"},"modified":"2003-01-12T21:59:10","modified_gmt":"2003-01-13T02:59:10","slug":"walton_jo_103_t","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/2003\/01\/walton_jo_103_t\/","title":{"rendered":"Walton, Jo: (103) The Prize in the Game"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name=\"90175803\"><\/a> <a name=\"link_90175803\"><\/a> <\/p>\n<p>John M. Ford once wrote that &#8220;Every book is three books, after all; the one the writer intended, the one the reader expected, and the one that casts its shadow when the first two meet by moonlight.&#8221; (&#8220;Rules of Engagement,&#8221; in <cite>From the End of the Twentieth Century<\/cite>.)<\/p>\n<p>Using that metaphor, the first time I read <strong>Jo Walton&#8217;s <cite>The Prize in the Game<\/cite><\/strong>, the cast shadow was even stranger than Deformed Rabbit (everyone&#8217;s favorite).<\/p>\n<p>The reason, I realized, was that I had one of the stranger possible sets of expectations going into the book&#8212;including the fact that the book is dedicated to me. So I re-read it with a clearer head, and I&#8217;m happy to say that it&#8217;s very good. However, in hopes of avoiding messing up <em>other<\/em> people&#8217;s expectations, I&#8217;m not going to talk about my weird expectations here, because it&#8217;s too hard to use spoiler protection in this format. Instead, you can read my <a href=\"http:\/\/groups.google.com\/groups?selm=6a342v8hnkqhdhtm8g7u8ed0pt9i9opkfo@news.earthlink.net\"> spoiler comments in a post to rec.arts.sf.written<\/a> (Google link; may take a few hours to show up). What follows is a semi-objective review that ought to suit people who haven&#8217;t yet read the book.<\/p>\n<p><cite>Prize<\/cite> is set in the same world as Walton&#8217;s first two novels, <a href=\"http:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/2001\/10\/zelazny_roger_a\/\"><cite>The King&#8217;s Peace<\/cite> and <cite>The King&#8217;s Name<\/cite><\/a>. It tells the backstory of the Isarnagan (Irish-equivalent) characters appearing in those books, as well as that of some who hadn&#8217;t appeared on-stage before. It ought to be possible to read <cite>Prize<\/cite> first, but my general rule is to read things in publication order. In this case, I think <cite>Prize<\/cite> would end rather abruptly to someone who didn&#8217;t know the eventual fates of the characters (there will be a sequel to <cite>Prize<\/cite>, called <cite>Breaking the Ward<\/cite>). It would certainly be a very different experience, anyway&#8212;a good analogy is reading <cite>A Deepness in the Sky<\/cite> before <cite>A Fire Upon the Deep<\/cite>. If anyone tries it, please report back to us.<\/p>\n<p><cite>Prize<\/cite> is told from four alternating points of view. Conal is one of the King of Oriel&#8217;s nephews. Elenn and Emer are the daughters of Connat&#8217;s rulers; Elenn is one of the most beautiful women in the world, and Emer aspires to be a charioteer. Ferdia is the heir to Lagin, third of the five kingdoms of Tir Isarnagiri; he is also close friends with Darag, Conal&#8217;s cousin and rival.<\/p>\n<p>As the book opens, Elenn, Emer, and Ferdia are all fostering at Oriel for a year. The plot is grounded in Irish myth, and stems from the contention over the heirship to Oriel, the ambitions of the King of Connat, and a deity&#8217;s curse&#8212;you know, standard stuff. I find myself unable to come up with a more useful summary that doesn&#8217;t spoil the book, for which I apologize. In a way, this is a compliment to the book, which is very effectively and efficiently constructed: the story flows very smoothly, with every event leading toward the climax, either directly or through foreshadowing (which is used frequently and, I thought, to quite good effect).<\/p>\n<p>The characterization and world-building are also portrayed thoroughly <em>and<\/em> economically, which I think is a pretty good trick. I doubt there&#8217;s a wasted word in the novel, though I wouldn&#8217;t call it an obscure or difficult book; it simply rewards careful reading. (There are one or two things that I&#8217;m not entirely clear on, which will appear in the spoiler section at the end of this post. However, they aren&#8217;t central to the book.) Obviously, a lot of thought has gone into building the world, but the book never stops and says, for instance, &#8220;Here now is an explication of different kinds of trees and the knowledge associated with them.&#8221; Instead, the third-person viewpoints mention the information that would naturally cross the minds of those characters&#8212;thus combining two of my favorite things, depth of world-building and internally consistent narrative voice.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks to the quality of the narration and the characterization, I certainly did not lack for emotional involvement with the characters. This was almost a problem; as Dennis Leary said in <cite>No Cure for Cancer<\/cite>, &#8220;From the beginning of time all the way up to U2&#8212;there has never been a happy Irish song,&#8221; and I rather suspect that applies to Irish myth, too. You&#8217;ve been warned. I found also it interesting to meet the younger versions of Conal, Emer, and Elenn, since I could see pretty easily how they became the people we first met in <cite>The King&#8217;s Peace<\/cite>, and to see Darag and Ferdia, who are mentioned in <cite>Peace<\/cite> and <cite>Name<\/cite> but do not appear.<\/p>\n<p>In summary: this was an excellent book, and I&#8217;m glad that I eventually liked it. Go read it and let me know what you thought.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>John M. Ford once wrote that &#8220;Every book is three books, after all; the one the writer intended, the one the reader expected, and the one that casts its shadow when the first two meet by moonlight.&#8221; (&#8220;Rules of Engagement,&#8221; in From the End of the Twentieth Century.) Using that metaphor, the first time I &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/2003\/01\/walton_jo_103_t\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Walton, Jo: (103) The Prize in the Game&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,15,21],"tags":[426],"class_list":["post-193","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-sf-and-fantasy","category-sulien-universe","tag-walton-jo"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/steelypips.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}