Pratchett, Terry: (05) Sourcery

I remembered exactly three things about Terry Pratchett’s Sourcery, which was up next in the Discworld re-read (it was a brain-rest between reads of The Sacred Band, the last Acacia book): it was a Rincewind book, it was about the eighth son of a wizard, and it was a Dungeon Dimensions plot. Which is to say, almost nothing.

Turns out, I’d even forgot that we didn’t own it; I must’ve thought so poorly of it that I didn’t pick up a UK paperback when I was building my library on a London study-abroad. (For those buying Pratchett in ebook now: the edition I bought is by Transworld Digital, is apparently a re-issue, and is definitely nicer than the HarperCollins ones that the NYPL has.)

At any rate. My memory was accurate enough as far as it went, though there wasn’t very much Dungeon Dimensions relative to the rest of the book (which is good because as mentioned before, not my thing). But there were four things I hadn’t remembered which it seems worth noting now:

First: holy cliffhanger, Batman. How did I forget that?!

Second: Lord Vetinari is named as the Patrician here, and is basically himself though not present very much.

Third: the portrait of the wizards here is kind of peculiar. On one hand, here is our introduction to Unseen University:

A kind of spring had even come to the ancient University itself. Tonight would be the Eve of Small Gods, and a new Archchancellor would be elected.

Well, not exactly elected, because wizards didn’t have any truck with all this undignified voting business, and it was well known that Archchancellors were selected by the will of the gods, and this year it was a pretty good bet that the gods would see their way clear to selecting old Virrid Wayzygoose, who was a decent old boy and had been patiently waiting his turn for years.

The Archchancellor of Unseen University was the official leader of all the wizards on the Disc. Once upon a time it had meant that he would be the most powerful in the handling of magic, but times were a lot quieter now and, to be honest, senior wizards tended to look upon actual magic as a bit beneath them. They tended to prefer administration, which was safer and nearly as much fun, and also big dinners.

And then there’s the first time we see a group of wizards:

Another reason for the general conviviality was the fact that no one was trying to kill anyone else. This is an unusual state of affairs in magical circles.

The higher levels of wizardry are a perilous place. Every wizard is trying to dislodge the wizards above him while stamping on the fingers of those below; to say that wizards are healthily competitive by nature is like saying that piranhas are naturally a little peckish. However, ever since the great Mage Wars left whole areas of the Disc uninhabitable, wizards have been forbidden to settle their differences by magical means, because it caused a lot of trouble for the population at large and in any case it was often difficult to tell which of the resultant patches of smoking fat had been the winner. So they traditionally resort to knives, subtle poisons, scorpions in shoes and hilarious booby traps involving razor-sharp pendulums.

At which point I made a “huh?” face, because while these are not strictly, literally inconsistent, well, they really sit very oddly together.

(Becca suggests, in a post with book-destroying spoilers, that this tension is deliberate, which I think is plausible yet poorly-managed if so.)

Fourth: the narrative travels to Klatch, which at this point is fantasy cliche Arabia (caliphs, evil viziers, magic carpets, slave markets, etc. etc.). It didn’t strike me as awful as opposed to eyebrow-raising, but this is an area where my antennae for problematic things here are not as finely tuned. In any event, I look forward to Jingo, which has to be an improvement.

Anyway. Has some good bits, but very minor Discworld.

No Comments

Durham, David Anthony: (01) Acacia (re-read); (02) The Other Lands

In preparation for the conclusion of David Anthony Durham’s Acacia trilogy, I re-read the first two books, Acacia and The Other Lands. I previously reviewed Acacia at some length over at Tor.com, and don’t have much to add now except that it does start a little slow and obvious, which makes the time-jump of several years after the first section all the more welcome.

I read The Other Lands not too long after it came out and then stalled badly on a review. I’ve just finished a re-read and will again try to do it some justice, especially since I’ve promised myself I can’t start the third (now out) until I wrote this one up.

As much as I liked Acacia, I think I like The Other Lands more, except insofar as it’s not nearly as standalone. Instead, it ends on the pause when everything’s been set up and is about to come crashing down: by my count, we are now poised on the verge of two world-spanning conflicts and one at-least-continent-spanning one. And yet the book still strikes me as faster-paced and more full of the fantastic than the first, so the happenings on the way are not static exposition.

(The prose style still tends somewhat toward exposition, and I’m not sure it’s best suited for some of the more delicate character work that’s being attempted. This is mostly an issue with regard to Corinn, regarding whose characterization I remain very nervous. Also, I’m not sure if I was supposed to find Melio as much as a jerk as I did.)

It’s also broader than the first book, not just in visiting the Other Lands (which are of course not Other to those who live there) but the characters we’re introduced to: more women, non-elites, queer people (not that they would self-identify as such). Also, SFF writers, take note: if you have already shown the full range of human skin colors in your story, then you may introduce beast-people without making your readers worry that you are taking the massively problematic step of substituting beast-people for humans of darker skin color.

If the theme of the first was stories and history, the theme of this one is children: existing, expected, unexpected, hoped-for, lost, prohibited. It is so universal that, I admit, on the re-read I occasionally felt like I was being hit over the head with it. (A very important note: Mena’s method of birth control does not work for humans in our world. But then, the attentive reader realized in Chapter One that human physiology is not the same there, when Corinn is said to have given birth after more than a year of pregnancy.)

Anyway, if you remotely liked the first, you should like The Other Lands. And it ends on such an amazing last couple of pages that it’s taken a real effort to wait to write this post before starting the next one. Now, it’s time to see if I think the series sticks the landing. Watch this space.

5 Comments

Chabon, Michael: Gentlemen of the Road (audio)

I was halfway through the audiobook of Michael Chabon’s Gentlemen of the Road, narrated by Andre Braugher, when I just stopped listening for no specific reason that I can remember now. It’s not particularly long and I had a good bit of driving over the last couple of days, so I went back to the start and finished it this morning.

This is known as a fun historical adventure tale in the pulp tradition (it was originally published in serialized form). It certainly has a great setting, 10th century Khazaria (now southwest Russia), and plenty of the classic swashbuckling elements (well, okay, I have no idea if elephants are part of that tradition, but if not, they should be).

However, unlike apparently everyone else in the world, I found this ultimately a bittersweet, somewhat melancholy experience. The narrative is keenly aware of the constraints that its characters live under, and while its ending is as happy as it could be—or perhaps even a bit more so, really—somewhat perversely, that had the effect of highlighting just how the narrow the scope of that ending was, and how much I would have liked it to be different.

I was also disappointed in Braugher’s reading on this listen, finding it faster and flatter than I would have liked. However, when someone gets to deliver dramatic dialogue, he unsurprisingly does very well.

No Comments

Pratchett, Terry: (03) Equal Rites (re-read), (04) Mort

Continuing the Discworld re-read; I missed posting about Equal Rites in time for Becca’s post, but I am ahead on Mort!

I don’t have much to say about Equal Rites, having re-read it moderately recently. In relation to the first two books, Cutangle feels way more like Ridcully than I’d remembered; Unseen University isn’t anywhere near the complex institution it will be yet, but in this and the next book, there are hints of its direction. (Institutions are a big thing in later Discworld books, and it’s interesting to see the starts toward that.) But, basically, my reaction to Equal Rites: Dungeon Dimensions plots still not my thing, and I desperately want more Esk than we have had to date.

Mort surprised me because I’d forgotten that we start “Death goes human” plots this early; as much as I love Hogfather, I wouldn’t have thought the series could sustain so many of those stories. (Maybe it can’t! I guess I’ll find out.) It feels very Discworld in its characters, but its ending strikes me as remarkably weak and unsatisfying—not just the blatant plot handwave but Death’s reaction that sets up the final confrontation. I liked it pretty well until then, though.

Finally, this is the first major-character romance in Discworld and it is as non-emotional to me as every other one until Unseen Academicals. (I originally wrote “unconvincing,” which this one is, but later ones I don’t find implausible, they just don’t create any emotional reactions in me.)

1 Comment

Pratchett, Terry: (01-02) The Colour of Magic and The Light Fantastic

Becca is re-reading Discworld one book every two weeks, which sounds like a good plan to me. She started with The Colour of Magic and The Light Fantastic together, which surprised me because I’d forgotten just how much of a cliffhanger Colour ends on. From this you can tell that I read these back in college when I first binged on Discworld and possibly not since.

I’m kind of amazed I made it past Colour, actually: I must have gotten a big stack out of the Boston Public Library and been warned that the first wasn’t very typical. Because wow, it really is not: it’s a series of pastiches/parodies of very specific things, and even the one of something I recognized (Pern) just was not my kind of thing. And yet Light, despite being as direct a sequel as possible, feels more or less like a Discworld book! Besides the things Becca points out, Light introduces the seeds of Mort, two books down the line, and Hogfather, a full eighteen books later. And of the two characters who were most jarring, Death stops being mad that Rincewind keeps cheating death and learns the card game bridge, and the Patrician (who can’t possibly be Vetinari, no matter what Pratchett has said extratextually) does not appear at all.

A very peculiar duology and only the place to start if you’re a completist (though I would be interested to hear how Light reads as a starting place, since I don’t think you really need to know much from the prior book to understand the action).

No Comments

Clarke, Susanna: (01) Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell (re-read)

I am quite sure I did not love Susanna Clarke’s Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell this much the first time I read it, and I can’t imagine why. This time I basically wanted to roll around in it and never come out again, and indeed ended up immediately re-reading the last third to stave off withdrawal.

The prose is amazing. When I was reading, I couldn’t help posting three characterization-focused quotes from just the first four chapters over at my journal. Even the chapter titles are perfect (“The ashes, the pearls, the counterpane and the kiss”). And both the eerie numinous and the humor are finer than I recalled.

I think I also appreciate more, this time, the argument it’s making about what it means to be English (via the nature of English magic). Granted, I am not English, so it is an argument that I can only look at from the outside, but at least with regard to race and gender, it strikes me as a position worth aspiring to.

Really, I know it’s cliché to say so, but the experience it reminded me most of was the last time I read Pride and Prejudice and made comparisons to chiming crystal—not just regarding the book and its quality, but how it made me feel, like I was vibrating all over with delight. And now, writing it up months after the fact, I am fiercely tempted to go and re-read it all over again. Gosh, I love this book.

(Two minor notes. First, the footnotes are not academic, that is, were not inserted by a present-day editor into a historical text. They were written by the same narrator as the main text, a narrator who is omniscient yet an individual (and female), in the same way that (again) Pride and Prejudice‘s narrator is. See chapter 5, note 4 for the same narrator (who says “why I do not know” in describing Mr Tubbs’ actions (emphasis added); and see chapter 40, note 3 for the furthest specific chronological reference in the entire book, as far as I can tell (1836, the death date of the Duke of Wellington’s horse).

(Second, a minor spoiler (ROT-13, see sidebar): fheryl gur snzvyl va gur ynfg puncgre, jvgu n pyretlzna sngure, guerr qnhtugref (vapyhqvat ng yrnfg bar cnffvbangryl svrepr bar), naq bar fba, ner n ersrerapr gb gur Oebagrf?)

1 Comment

Brust, Steven: (113) Tiassa

My attitude toward Steven Brust’s Tiassa is pretty mixed. On one hand, it has a great deal of cool stuff in it (Devera POV! Paarfi doing Vlad’s dialogue, which is hilarious! Answers to some long-standing questions!) On the other hand—well, actually, there are two other hands.

The first other hand is that this is another interstitial book and, as with Iorich, I still want forward movement.

The second other hand is that my initial reaction to the events of the book was that they were mildly dissatisfying in and of their own right. rushthatspeaks argued persuasively (link to day view so as to preserve spoiler cut, scroll down) that I was looking at the book in the wrong way. I’ve since re-read with that perspective in mind, and I agree with it, but I’m not sure I would have come to that conclusion on my own—which makes me think that I do not think like a Tiassa, whereas rushthatspeaks does. (I’m not sure what House I think like. You’d think it’d be Iorich, with being a lawyer and all, but I didn’t understand Iorich‘s plot either. Next time I re-read the series it will be fun to look at books with that question in mind.)

At any rate, on the re-read, this was enjoyable, but I continue to be distracted by fretting about the overall direction of the series. Which I freely admit says more about me than anything else, but hey, this is why this is a personal booklog and not a set of formally-published reviews.

And now, to figure out why The Dragaera Timeline keeps hanging Calibre when I try to add it as an e-book.

4 Comments

Bujold, Lois McMaster: (115) Cryoburn; Ten-Year Anniversary

For quite some time, I thought I might not read Cryoburn, the latest Vorkosigan book by Lois McMaster Bujold, at all.

I managed to spoil myself for it, you see, and not only did I think it might be a difficult read for purely personal reasons, but it sounded very much like not the book I wanted. Which is a problem I’ve been having with the latest books in the Vorkosigan series—as I previously said, I liked A Civil Campaign less after time went by, because it moved too quickly and was too easy; and similarly, Diplomatic Immunity has become less satisfying to me over time, because I really want it to have been a dual-POV book, Miles and Ekaterin. So since I’ve been feeling over the prior two books that Ekaterin has been shortchanged, the news that Cryoburn took place off Barrayar and that Ekaterin was Lady Not Appearing did not thrill me—even before getting into spoiler issues.

But then I was browsing Lightreads’ archives for some reason and came across her assessment of Cryoburn, which called it a romp, and I thought maybe I was in the mood for it after all, now that I’d had time to adjust to the idea that it wasn’t the book I was hoping for.

Unfortunately I both agree with Lightreads and don’t. I agree that “it’s a hundred thousand words of Miles repeatedly happening to people,” but as far as I’m concerned, that’s a bad thing. (Though we don’t agree on this book, I quite recommend Lightreads for book blogging generally.) There’s no jeopardy for Miles, nothing at stake for him, and while I see all the thematic things it’s doing, I don’t want those things as indirect themes while Miles is happening to other people, I want them happening to him. “Remote” is not a quality I prize in a Vorkosigan book.

I also have some issues with the plot; the setup of the planet, where people are cryogenically frozen and leave their voting proxies with the corporations who froze them, seems so obviously ripe for corruption that it’s hard to believe that people didn’t foresee it. And the explanation for the bad guys’ big plan seems to be missing a step somewhere. (Morning ETA: this is what I get for writing quick after a long day. I am also dubious about the planet’s use of Japanese honorifics and other cultural trappings, especially so far in the future and in a place that never had a Time of Isolation and that has such far-reaching and negative corporate involvement.)

So, while I don’t quite wish I hadn’t read it, it definitely lived down to my expectation that it was not the book I wanted.


On another note: Today is the ten-year anniversary of this booklog, which is kind of amazing to me. (Ideally you should here imagine Jeremy Piven’s character in Grosse Pointe Blank saying, “Ten years!”) When I started this, I was in law school, unmarried, and childless; now I’m married, working as a lawyer, half-orphaned, and have one kid and another on the way. I also started a journal (first at LiveJournal and now at Dreamwidth), which means the occasional personal tidbits that appeared here early are elsewhere; and over at Tor.com, I spent a ridiculously long time re-reading The Lord of the Rings one chapter at a time.

I hadn’t planned to do anything particular for the anniversary, but then I realized it was today and that the next post in the mental queue was already about my changing assessments of books, so I couldn’t resist. (I sometimes think about going back and putting “I no longer agree with this” comments on older books, but that seems like a big enough project that I’ve never gotten around to it.) I’m not sure I’m capable of summing up, or even recognizing, all the ways my reading has changed over the last ten years, though I have tried to be more consciously aware of problematic stereotypes and tropes, especially with regard to race and disability.

In any event, even after ten years I still really enjoy writing this and have no intention of stopping, despite the occasional moribund period, of which the most recent was by far the longest. (I did briefly consider moving it to Dreamwidth, for the community norms of increased commenting, but it would be very hard to duplicate all the functionality there, and the back-referencing would be a nightmare. Anyway, I know way more people lurk, and that’s fine, really, I just had to remind myself of that!) I am always writing draft posts in my head after I finish a book, and it’s a genuine relief to get them out on the booklog, both for my own reference and for whatever use they are to others.

In conclusion: Ten years!

6 Comments

Resnick, Laura: (03) Unsympathetic Magic

Here’s the thing about Laura Resnick’s Unsympathetic Magic. I decided to read it because I needed something entertaining but undemanding. And when I’m in that kind of mood, I usually read very quickly indeed: skimming over the top, as it were, because I don’t have enough brainpower to go more deeply.

It is therefore a problem when I, reading in this mode, nevertheless spend a quarter of the book yelling at the characters to pay attention to a blatantly obvious threat. And that’s putting aside my spotting the villain immediately, because that involved metatextual reasons that I can’t properly attribute to the characters.

(I also have issues with a key scene between Esther and her on-again, off-again love interest, but by that point I was pretty much just trying to get to the end, already.)

In short, this series is now on probation: if the next book has the same issues, I’m dropping the series.

Finally, I should note that this book is about Haitian Vodou, and while its treatment of the religion seemed balanced and respectful to me (including some extensive conversational infodumps—hooray skimming!), it’s not my tradition or culture and there may well be subtleties that escaped me.

No Comments

Pratchett, Terry: (37-38) Unseen Academicals; I Shall Wear Midnight

A mix of catching up and new reading, this time, with Terry Pratchett’s two most recent Discworld books, Unseen Academicals and I Shall Wear Midnight. I read the first when it came out, but hadn’t gotten around to the second until just now. My reaction to both of these is pretty similar: they don’t quite hang together, but are nevertheless very hard to put down and have a more than sufficient proportion of awesome things.

Unseen Academicals is trying to do too much at once: football (soccer, to Americans), Unseen University politics, the fashion industry, and another take on species-ism. The fantastical bits regarding football seem entirely superfluous, and attempting to relate the book’s storylines to our world’s issues regarding racism and LGBTQ issues is not recommended. But I still like it for its treatment of class, which seems to me a bit more complex than usual, and because all of a sudden Pratchett can write these delicate touching romances—which I absolutely would never have expected after Carrot/Angua and Sam/Sybil, but there is it, Nation was not a fluke.

I also listened to Stephen Briggs read this, and he does his usual impeccable job. In fact, I’m pretty sure I listened to it first and then read it, because I remember thinking that when I got to a particular line in text, I was glad I had Briggs’ reading because otherwise I wouldn’t have got it “right” in my own head (oblique spoilers at most, but it is at the climax, so ROT13’ed (see sidebar): “pbzr ba vs lbh guvax lbh’er uneq rabhtu.”).

I Shall Wear Midnight, the fourth Tiffany Aching book, doesn’t feel terribly new after the other books about witches, Tiffany included, and has one thread that is both amazingly welcome and yet weirdly disconnected from the rest (spoilers, again ROT13’ed: vg’f ybiryl gb frr rfx ntnva, juvpu v arire gubhtug jbhyq unccra, ohg gur gvzr geniry ovg bgurejvfr frrzf, uzz, bayl gurzngvpnyyl arprffnel gb gur obbx, ng irel zbfg). But it has some great creepy moments, it surprised me in a few small ways, it has loads of momentum, and it feels like a good place to leave Tiffany and the rest of the witches.

Oh, and another format note: since this book had chapters, I wish the e-book put the footnotes at the end of the chapters rather than the end of the file; it would make it easier to see how much actual story was left when looking at the page X of Y status bar. (Also this book seemed to have more footnotes than necessary, but I suppose that may have been a concession to its nominal YA nature.)

1 Comment