McKinley, Robin: Knot in the Grain and Other Stories, A

I picked up A Knot in the Grain and Other Stories, by Robin McKinley, Thursday night because I still was experiencing leftover hyperactivity from the trial at the start of the week. Fairy tales seemed like a good way to calm down enough to go to sleep. (The hyper feeling is gone, by the way; I walked around Friday like a zombie, and was hardly better Saturday, despite having done basically nothing all day. Well, besides making an offer on a house.)

There are five stories in this collection; the first two are explicitly set in Damar, since Luthe appears, and the last is set our world or something like it. “The Healer” is the first story, about a woman who has never been able to speak and a man who has lost his magecraft. It’s an odd story because the text leaves it ambiguous as to whether it’s meant to have a happy ending. The second, “The Stagman,” is a look at the subtle damage a wicked uncle can inflict on a princess and at what Luthe can and can’t do.

“Touk’s House” is the third; it starts out as Rapunzel, and comes full circle by the end, but all the same I think it would be inaccurate to call it a Rapunzel story. Which is a good trick, and I enjoyed it. I also liked “Buttercups” for the imagery and the characters; it, oddly, has moral to spare—perhaps making up for “The Healer”?

I was quite close to really liking the title story. It has dead-on descriptions of not knowing anyone and feeling socially awkward. At one point, the protagonist thinks how weeding the garden “didn’t go in a letter very well. It was what kept Annabelle going, but it wasn’t anything she could talk about. This seemed to be part of not having anyone to talk to. It was very confusing.” I knew the feeling; when I was studying for the bar, I usually wouldn’t have an actual conversation until dinnertime, and by then I would have literally lost nouns in all that silence. (“You know, the, the thing.”) However, the event that kicks off the plot is the proposed construction of a highway through the small upstate New York town where the protagonist has moved. The characters all oppose it, and I’m quite sure the reader is supposed to agree. However, Chad’s family is from a small upstate town that had a highway put through it, and they tell me how much a difference the highway has made to the local economy. So when the developers appears at the town meeting and are described as knowing “how to talk about ‘helping the economic profile of this rather depressed area.’ They made the highway sound like a slight inconvenience for a good cause—what were a few meadows and trees one way or another?”, I’m nodding along with the developers, because there is a lot of rural poverty in upstate New York. In other words, I am pretty thoroughly not the audience McKinley was intending for this story. Other people would probably like it just fine, though.

Overall I like this collection better than The Door in the Hedge, because the stories are considerably more concrete. Worth reading.

3 Comments

Peters, Ellis: (11) An Excellent Mystery

An Excellent Mystery is the eleventh of Ellis Peters’ Brother Cadfael novels and the first in the series that I’ve read for a while. It’s also the first one that I can’t say I actually like. Of course, saying why would require explaining the whole story; if you’ve read it, you’ll understand what I mean when I say that the plot turns on a mindset that I find just weird, somewhat uncomfortably so.

(Oh, and the title is actually not generic.)

2 Comments

Roberts, Nora: Three Fates

While I was at the library over the weekend, I was primarily looking for brain candy: I was scheduled to go to a trial in Utica, an hour and a half away, for a couple of days, and I knew that I’d need something fluffy to read at night to decompress. (Just to watch and help my boss; I’m not admitted to the bar yet, so I don’t get to talk.) Nora Roberts’ Three Fates is about as fluffy as you can get and was perfect for the job.

I actually ended up reading it all last night, which turned out well because the trial ended today, a day earlier than expected. [We won. Decisively, in so far as one can win a trial decisively: the jury was out for only 45 minutes, which suggests that they hardly needed to deliberate, and the judge basically told the plaintiff not to bother with post-trial motions, since he didn’t have a leg to stand on. Which he didn’t. (Appeals are different from post-trial motions, and wouldn’t go to this judge.)] I hadn’t planned to read the whole thing in one night, but it’s such brain candy that it reads really quickly, and I wanted to be sure I was well and truly tired before I tried sleeping alone, in a strange bed, with a pillow made of spun rock, and with our case on for the next day.

The plot of this is almost beside the point (in a week I won’t remember anyone’s names, just wait). Basically, there were three statutes of the Fates (Clotho, Lachesis, and Atropos, those Fates). One of them was thought to have been lost when the Lusitania sank, but it was actually stolen just before the sinking by a petty thief, who reformed after his near-death experience but passed the statute down as a family heirloom. Then one of the heirs gets an inkling that this might actually be worth something, brings it to the villain for an appraisal, has it stolen by the villain, and then sets out with his two siblings to get it back, and track down the other two for good measure. And everyone falls in love, and the villain is eeeeevil, and eventually everything works out okay. The End.

This one does include nice caper bits, which I always enjoy even if I doubt Roberts’ research. I don’t believe in fate; I rather think it’s impossible for a materialist to believe in fate, actually. (Materialist as in physical matter is all that exists, not as in money money money.) However, this is one of the advantages of plowing through brain candy: potentially-annoying bits just fly right by and barely register.

I’m still a little hyper from the trial, even after driving back from Utica, so I think I shall stop babbling and go read some Brother Cadfael to calm down now. Yay, being home . . .

No Comments

McKinley, Robin: Stone Fey, The

I was browsing around the library yesterday, and found myself in the YA section. I picked up Robin McKinley’s The Stone Fey out of curiosity, saw that it was a Damar story from the inside cover, and decided to check it out.

Actually I read the whole thing while waiting for Chad to come pick me up; it’s a children’s book illustrated by John Clapp. I don’t quite know why it was published in this format, since it doesn’t really strike me as a children’s story; at the least, it would fit perfectly well in any adult collection. Despite the title, the story is very tightly focused on the viewpoint character, Maddy, a shepherd in the Hills of Damar who meets a stone fey one night. (I mentioned McKinley’s tendency to treat names as almost incidental in my comments about The Door in the Hedge, and it’s the same here; we don’t learn Maddy’s name until page 22 of a 52 page story.)

Because it’s such a short story, there’s not much to say about the plot, which besides will probably be predictable to most people familiar with fairy tales. Like all of McKinley’s work, it’s very atmospheric, but I can’t help but feel something’s missing from it. I can’t quite put my finger on it, but I think it’s too tightly focused on Maddy. At any rate, an interesting little book, but not fully satisfying.

No Comments

Elrod, P.N.: (02) Lifeblood

I started P.N. Elrod’s Lifeblood on Monday on the grounds that it was really short, and finished it Friday night in my post-NITA-collapse. [*] This is the sequel to Bloodlist and the second in the Vampire Files series.

Fellow readers, I ask you: does Jack get the crap beat out of him in every book in this series? I know this is a noir-homage kind of series, but if it’s a homage to that kind of story, then I’d like to know so I can avoid them unless I’m in the mood for something fairly dark.

Other than that, it was a perfectly good short read. By rights it should have been even shorter than it is, since as far as I can tell, the first two chapters don’t actually have anything to do with the plot (in which vampire hunters come after Jack, and Jack’s past comes back to haunt him). I am interested whether the author has a grand theory of the workings of vampires; some of the characters have been discussing how, for instance, a creature with no heartbeat can live on blood, and if eventually they’re going to come up with a theory, that might be fun to read about.

[*] NITA is the National Institute for Trial Advocacy; I went to a four-day training of theirs (sort of; it was run in-house but with their materials and one of their people leading the training) on, well, trial advocacy this week. It was very intense, a hell of a lot of work, and really draining. I do feel I learnt a lot, though I can’t say I cared for the way the program was set up. Don’t let TV and movies fool you—doing this kind of stuff the right way is damn hard and requires overcoming a lot of instincts you don’t even realize you have.

2 Comments

Smith, Sherwood, and Dave Trowbridge: (05) The Thrones of Kronos

Last Friday night, when I finished reading The Thrones of Kronos, the last book of Sherwood Smith and Dave Trowbridge’s Exordium series, I had the following thoughts more-or-less in this order:

  • Arrgh!
  • You looked up “exordium,” you should have expected this.
  • Well, that was . . . strange.
  • Maybe reading a big complicated book in tiny chunks during lunch, and then in the same room as Chad watching Pleasantville, wasn’t such a good idea—you know you don’t block out distractions very well.
  • Clearly I need to read this again. In large distraction-free chunks this time.
  • Hell, it’s going to be forever until I can manage that.

So I finished my re-read yesterday night, and anyone who cares will be pleased to know that it was much less strange when read under proper conditions. However, people who like their fiction to conclude with all the ends tied neatly in a bow should probably avoid this; put another way, if you didn’t like Tigana‘s ending, you’ll hate this one. (The authors did warn us, though: the definition of “exordium” is “a beginning or introductory part.”) I have a reasonable tolerance for this sort of thing, so I’m basically resigned to the unresolved parts of this series; there’s just one thing that, in my opinion, fits better with the main plot than as a life-goes-on. On the other hand, I’m probably biased because I just really want to know . . .

Beyond the ending proper, this volume was an almost entirely satisfying conclusion to the series. I’m not entirely sure what one particular plot thread ended up contributing, but beyond that, I really enjoyed it. I wish I had time to re-read it all from the start, but I’ve started an actual job (gasp! shock!) and the next couple of weeks in particular are not going to lend themselves to reading long complicated works.

I’ve been trying to think of other things to say here about Thrones and failing miserably, because they’d be incomprehensible without spoilers. Also, I’m coming down with a cold and have to Entertain shortly, so I’m a bit distracted. I plan, sometime, to write up a general review for sf.written and to append spoiler comments to that; I’ll post the link here in a comment when I get around to it (conducting spoiler conversations is rather awkward in this format).

But, in short: yay, space opera. Go agitate for Baen or someone to reprint these.

8 Comments

Smith, Sherwood, and Dave Trowbridge: (04) The Rifter’s Covenant

Yesterday, I finished book four of Sherwood Smith and Dave Trowbridge’s Exordium series, The Rifter’s Covenant. It doesn’t end on as a wham-bang note as the previous one, but I’m even more eager to find out what happens in the next and final volume: not only do I want to see if Our Heroes make it out of their tense situations reasonably intact and heart-whole, but it will be interesting to see how some of the plot threads and characters we’ve been following will come into play.

Oh, and my Guy Kay in spaaace comment wasn’t so far-fetched after all: the series’ original editor apparently compared these to Dorothy Dunnett, who was a big influence on Kay. (I should start a sf.written thread on “Lymond homages in sf,” really.) Unfortunately, beyond that, I can’t think of much else to say today; been rather ill all weekend and my brain is fried. (Boy, I really hope I feel better by tomorrow, or I will have the world’s worst first day at work . . . )

6 Comments

Smith, Sherwood, and Dave Trowbridge: (03) A Prison Unsought

I’m discovering that the other bad thing about the Exordium series being comprehensively out of print is that I don’t have anyone to discuss spoilers with. The end of book three, A Prison Unsought, is so cool—a brilliantly done, heart-stopping page-turner—that I want to say to someone, “Wasn’t that cool? When so-and-so did this, and the underestimating, and that meeting, and that battle—and gosh, those last two pages!” And I can’t, because no-one else has read them.

The first bad thing, of course, is that they’re good and a lot of people would really enjoy them. As I am.

(My shower-thought for the day was “Hey, these are Guy Kay in spaaaace.” Which should be taken with several grains of salt because I’m really short on sleep, but it came to mind when thinking about a musical performance that Brandon arranged and the many different meanings everyone took from it. Besides music, there’s intrigue, the importance of history, brilliant rulers, complex sexual relationships, and something bittersweet and true. I don’t want to take this too far—the prose isn’t a point of similarity—but I thought it an interesting comparison. See, another reason for these to come back in print, so people can tell me I’m full of it . . . )

6 Comments

Smith, Sherwood, and Dave Trowbridge: (02) Ruler of Naught

Ruler of Naught is the second book in Sherwood Smith and Dave Trowbridge’s Exordium series, following The Phoenix in Flight. It’s hard to know how much to say about the plots of these, especially since I know most of my readers haven’t read them; I’m already spoiled to the extent that I read the back blurb of each volume as I got them, which I somewhat regret.

So instead I’ll talk about a couple of notable non-plot items. The first is the kind of hard sf idea that made me say, “Why hasn’t anyone else thought of this?” (Someone might have, but not that I or Chad have come across.) The idea is this: a FTL-capable ship discovers that something happened, say, five hours ago, that it needs to know about. It then jumps six light-hours away from where the event happened, and after it sends out a bunch of smaller ships to function as a telescopic array—voila! a window into the past. Maybe not one with the best resolution, but a window nevertheless. Cool, huh?

Any number of the characters in these are notable, but I’ll just mention two here. Brandon, last surviving heir to the Panarchy, is one of the more interesting and also one of the more enigmatic, as we rarely get sections from his point of view. We see many of the events affecting Brandon from the point of view of Osri, who is shaping up nicely; he was rather annoying in the first book, but is now starting to grow up a bit. I like having the coming-of-age person be different from the questing-for-the-throne person; while it’s not a universal cliche to make one person play both roles, I still think it’s a refreshing change. (Because, you know, Garion would just never survive among space pirates . . . )

Now I must tear myself away from this very promising NetHack game long enough to get started on book 3 . . .

[ In booklog news, a couple of days ago I asked “if some PHP expert can come up with a way for the “e-mail” and “homepage” links to not appear when someone doesn’t enter anything in those fields” when submitting a comment. Some PHP expert did: thanks to Steve Cook for providing the hack (and to Sean Miller for independently taking a look at the problem). Yay, a more elegant commenting system . . . ]

1 Comment

Smith, Sherwood, and Dave Trowbridge: (01) The Phoenix in Flight

Space opera!

To be precise, The Phoenix in Flight, book one of the Exordium series by Sherwood Smith and Dave Trowbridge. I’d seen this recommended in conjunction with the Mageworlds books—to be precise, on the web pages of the Mageworlds authors—as “if you like . . . ” And so far, I like very much.

These are all out of print, and a couple of the five volumes are almost legendarily hard to find. With some good luck, I managed to acquire them all over a few months, and now I have the time to read them all at once.

The Phoenix in Flight is precisely what you would want in a big chewy space opera. In the background, there’s thousands of years of history, humanity spread across the stars, and a scattering of mysterious alien races and artifacts; in the story, there’s betrayals and intricate plots and counter-plots, interesting characters with conflicts of oaths and ambiguous loyalties, space battles and daredevil piloting and things blowing up, and of course fighting in palace corridors (including one of the best uses of household systems I’ve seen). Whew. There’s really nothing like good space opera . . .

The characters also get really cool names. Jerrode Eusabian, Avatar of Dol, Lord of Vengeance and the Kingdoms of Dol’jhar, has sworn, well, vengeance on the Panarch of the Thousand Suns, the ruler of this section of the galaxy. And, after twenty years of planning, has killed two of the Panarch’s sons, imprisoned the Panarch, and taken the Emerald Throne. Except that two things have eluded Eusabian’s control: a mysterious alien artifact, and the youngest of the Panarch’s sons.

To be, as they say, continued . . .

5 Comments